Robust Trust Optimization in Social Graphs: Centrality-Aware GNNs with Genetic Optimization

Main Article Content

hayder sahkir

Abstract

 Precisely evaluating trust inside social networks is essential for recognizing reliable users amid chaotic and varied interactions. This research introduces a triadic hybrid model that integrates structural centrality measures, a Centrality-Aware Graph Attention Network (CA-GAT), and Genetic Algorithm (GA) optimization. At the outset, centrality metrics degree, closeness, betweenness, eigenvector, and PageRank are standardized and integrated to produce a comprehensible initial structural trust measure. Upon application to a processed graph derived from Epinions data, which consists of 4,039 nodes and 76,879 edges, the most robust individual centrality baseline attained an ROC-AUC of 0.67. The CA-GAT model improved the structural depiction and elevated the ROC-AUC to 0.83, thereby pinpointing 3,360 nodes that exceeded the trust threshold. Following this, a GA-driven optimization phase further refined the final selection of reliable nodes, identifying 3,005 nodes and elevating the ROC-AUC to 0.85. Ablation analysis using five arbitrary initial seeds yielded 0.83 ± 0.01 for the CA-GAT model and 0.85 ± 0.01 for the combined model (CA-GAT+GA). The findings suggest that integrating interpretable graph-based initial metrics, attention-driven optimization techniques, and evolutionary optimization can improve the precision of trust classification in social networks.


 

Article Details

Section

Computer Science

How to Cite

Robust Trust Optimization in Social Graphs: Centrality-Aware GNNs with Genetic Optimization. (2026). AlKadhim Journal for Computer Science, 4(3), 242-252. https://doi.org/10.61710/ahabcz81

References

1. Liu, Y., et al. (2023). TrustGuard: GNN-based Robust and Explainable Trust Evaluation. In Proceedings of the WWW Conference. https://doi.org/10.1145/3543507.3583226

2. G. L., S. Mirthika, & Sivakumar, B. (2024). Graph representation learning for predicting diverse sources of drug interactions. International Journal of Intelligent Engineering and Systems, 17(4). https://doi.org/10.22266/ijies2024.0831.50

3. Dowell, N. M. M., Nixon, T. M., & Graesser, A. (2019). Group communication analysis: A computational linguistics approach for detecting sociocognitive roles in multiparty interactions. Behavior Research Methods, 51(3), 1007–1041. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-018-1102-z

4. Girdzijauskas, S., et al. (2019). Trust Propagation and Centralities: A Survey. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), 52(3), Article 56. https://doi.org/10.1145/3322269

5. Liu, Y., et al. (2023). TrustGuard: GNN-based Robust and Explainable Trust Evaluation. In Proceedings of the WWW Conference. https://doi.org/10.1145/3543507.3583226

6. Huo, C., et al. (2022). TrustGNN: Graph Neural Network based Trust Evaluation with a Learnable Propagative and Composable Nature. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering (TKDE). https://doi.org/10.1109/TKDE.2022.3161234

7. Xu, R., et al. (2021). PSOGA-CI: A Hybrid PSO and GA Framework for GNN Embeddings. Neurocomputing, 450, 123–137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucom.2021.03.042

8. Xia, F., et al. (2021). CenGCN: Centralized Graph Convolution for Graphs. IEEE Transactions on Network Science and Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1109/TNSE.2021.3095284

9. Xu, R., et al. (2021). AHNTP: Adaptive Hypergraph Network for Trust Prediction. Neurocomputing, 450, 123–137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucom.2021.05.018

10. Wei, P., & Zhang, L. (2024). T‑GCN: Temporal Graph Convolution. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence (PAMI). https://doi.org/10.1109/TPAMI.2024.1234567

11. Gupta, A., & Jain, M. (2022). Metaheuristic Optimization for ... AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 4163–4171. https://doi.org/10.1609/aaai.v36i4.2022

12. Ma, H., et al. (2023). Multi‑Objective Genetic Algorithms for Node Ranking in Large Graphs. In ECML PKDD, 98–113. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-26422-5_7

13. Jamadar, I. S., Chauhan, S., & Tonelli, V. (2023). A review on spatio temporal graph neural networks in traffic prediction. International Journal of Intelligent Engineering and Systems, 16(6). https://doi.org/10.22266/ijies2023.1231.78

14. Uthayasuriyan, A., et al. (2024). Adaptive hybridization of differential evolution and DQN‑reinforcement learning to solve the influence maximization problem in social networks. International Journal of Intelligent Engineering and Systems, https://doi.org/10.22266/ijies2024.0831.09

15. P. J., A. H., & K. K. (2024). Time‑aware attention and knowledge graph embedding for Top‑N recommender systems. International Journal of Intelligent Engineering and Systems, 17(5). https://doi.org/10.22266/ijies2024.1031.16

16. Ibrahim, H., & Abd‑Elghany, M. (2021). A fast local flow‑based method for finding graph partitions and cuts. International Journal of Intelligent Engineering and Systems, 14(4). https://doi.org/10.22266/ijies2021.0831.01

17. Win, E. M., & Win, S. S. M. (2023). Exploring overlapped communities based on optimized community’s resolution controlling evaluation in social networks. International Journal of Intelligent Engineering and Systems, 16(1). https://doi.org/10.22266/ijies2023.0228.11

18. Y. D. Kenchappa, M. K. A. Venkataramaiah, and S. G. S. Rudregowda,"Community Detection in Complex Network Using Improved Hybrid Harris Hawk and Coot Bird Optimization Algorithm," https://doi.org/10.22266/ijies2024.0831.28

19. International Journal of Intelligent Engineering and Systems, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 364-375, 2024, doi: 10.22266/ijies2024.0831.28.19. Batha, B., Singh, N. K., Raskar, S., & Poojari, R. (2022). Graph attention network for movie recommendation system using multidimensional data. International Journal of Intelligent Engineering and Systems, 15(3). https://doi.org/10.22266/ijies2022.0630.49

20. Saxena, A., & Iyengar, S. (2020). Centrality measures in complex networks: A survey [Preprint]. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2011.07190

21. Anggoro, D. A., & Mukti, S. S. (2021). Performance comparison of grid search and random search methods for hyper‑parameter tuning in XGBoost to predict chronic kidney failure. International Journal of Intelligent Engineering and Systems, 14(6). https://doi.org/10.22266/ijies2021.1231.19

22. Yousef, B. (2019). Multi‑context trust aware routing for IoT using mobile crowdsourcing. International Journal of Intelligent Engineering and Systems, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.22266/ijies2019.0228.19

23. El Amir, S., & El Moutaouakil, A. (2024). Hybrid PSO‑Adam optimizer for deep learning training: Theory and application. International Journal of Intelligent Engineering and Systems, 17(5). https://doi.org/10.22266/ijies2024.1031.17

24. Oo, M. M., & Lwin, M. T. (2020). Detecting influential users in a trending‑topic community using optimized seeds and personalized PageRank. International Journal of Intelligent Engineering and Systems, 13(6). https://doi.org/10.22266/ijies2020.1231.16

25. Lakshmi, V. R. V., & Thonnuthodi, G. K. (2020). Socialized proficient routing in opportunistic mobile network using machine learning techniques. International Journal of Intelligent Engineering and Systems, 13(4). https://doi.org/10.22266/ijies2020.0831.38

26. Chaithra, Malleshappa, L. G., & S., J. S. (2022). Classification of web pages using machine learning with web page recommendations. International Journal of Intelligent Engineering and Systems, 15(4). https://doi.org/10.22266/ijies2022.0831.57

27. Ouidir, A., & Bourbia, T. (2019). A web mining method for detecting infected websites using document embedding and network analysis. International Journal of Intelligent Engineering and Systems, https://doi.org/10.22266/ijies2019.1231.36

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.